Peer Review Process
An article will be peer-reviewed after it is submitted. Our journals are all peer-reviewed. The journal editor appoints reviewers.
Peer review serves two important purposes:
1. To function as a filter, determining the work's validity, importance, and originality in order to guarantee that only good research is published.
2. Giving reviewers the chance to recommend adjustments in order to improve the quality of research submitted for publication.
The method for reviewing
Each manuscript that is submitted is subjected to the following review procedure:
1. Initially, each submission will be run using the Turnitin program to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted articles, with the results of the test being communicated to the journal's Editor-in-Chief only in the case of an abnormal percentage of similarity.
2. If there is no conflict of interest, the Editor-in-Chief decides on general publishing acceptability.
3. In the event of a conflict of interest, the Editorial Office assigns the paper to an Editor (Helper editor).
4. The Editor-in-Chief (or the Assistant Editor) appoints two Reviewers to conduct an impartial evaluation of the article.
5. The Journal employs double-blind peer review, which means that the Reviewers are unaware of the Authors' identities, and the Authors are unaware of the Reviewers' identities; based on the Reviewers' recommendations, the Editor-in-Chief (or the Helper Editor) decides whether the article should be accepted as is, revised, or rejected.
6. The Editor notifies the Corresponding Author via email of the editing decision, Editor comments, and Reviewer comments.
7. Authors will be invited to amend their work in response to the Reviewers' recommendations, comments, and criticisms; the updated manuscript must be given within one month of the review process being begun; otherwise, the review process will be repeated.
The Journal is published twice a year.
The submitter is asked to propose two suitable reviewers with the relevant recognized competence to assess the paper during the submission process. The Managing Editor will not automatically approve these reviewers. Please give specific contact information in Step 1 of the submission procedure (address, homepage, phone, verified institutional e-mail address). According to the review process's Ethical criterion, the recommended reviewers should not be current collaborators of the co-authors or have published with any of the co-authors of the paper within the previous five years. They should be from the writers' various institutions.
The submitter may also suggest relevant members of this journal's Editorial Board as possible reviewers. The submitter may also recommend reviewers from writers whose work you commonly cite in your manuscript.